<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eyewear &#8211; MARKS IP LAW FIRM</title>
	<atom:link href="https://marks-iplaw.jp/tag/eyewear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://marks-iplaw.jp</link>
	<description>Japanese IP Attorney Firm specializing in Trademarks with a commitment to excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 03:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>ja</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>JPO denied registration of Thom Browne RWB Stripe as a color mark three times in a row</title>
		<link>https://marks-iplaw.jp/thom-browne-rwb-stripe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Masaki MIKAMI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 02:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquired distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 3(1)(iii)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Color mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Device mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Famous mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inherent distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Position mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combination of colors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eyewear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JAPAN PATENT OFFICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thom Browne]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://marks-iplaw.jp/?p=5351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The JPO examiner rejected Thom Browne branding identifier, the red, white, and blue stripes as a color mark, d <a class="more-link" href="https://marks-iplaw.jp/thom-browne-rwb-stripe/">Read More ...</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The JPO examiner rejected Thom Browne branding identifier, the red, white, and blue stripes as a color mark, due to a lack of inherent distinctiveness and non-conformity with the requisites for a color mark.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-text-color has-black-color has-alpha-channel-opacity has-black-background-color has-background is-style-wide"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Thom Browne&#8217;s signature red, white, and blue stripes</strong></h2>



<p>Thom Brown, Inc. filed two trademark applications for a color mark to represent Thom Browne&#8217;s signature red, white, and blue stripe (see below) via the Madrid Protocol with the JPO for use on eyewear, eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, and sunglasses in Class 9.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>IR 1744718</strong></h3>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="704" height="704" src="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4ead52cb-bcca-4e1b-a06b-452495ea509c.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5352" style="width:298px;height:auto" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4ead52cb-bcca-4e1b-a06b-452495ea509c.jpg 704w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4ead52cb-bcca-4e1b-a06b-452495ea509c-300x300.jpg 300w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4ead52cb-bcca-4e1b-a06b-452495ea509c-150x150.jpg 150w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4ead52cb-bcca-4e1b-a06b-452495ea509c-75x75.jpg 75w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4ead52cb-bcca-4e1b-a06b-452495ea509c-200x200.jpg 200w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4ead52cb-bcca-4e1b-a06b-452495ea509c-100x100.jpg 100w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4ead52cb-bcca-4e1b-a06b-452495ea509c-40x40.jpg 40w" sizes="(max-width: 704px) 100vw, 704px" /></figure>
</div>


<p>The applicant specified the mark as “The color(s) white, red, and blue is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of tag, label, and design features comprising five contiguous bands, the first, third, and fifth being white, the second band red, and the fourth band blue; the first and fifth bands are of a smaller width than the second, third, and fourth bands; the dashed-lined border is included merely for perspective and is not part of the mark.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>IR 1750744</strong></h3>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img decoding="async" width="832" height="480" src="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/aa04cc46-c785-4ba7-8b57-c18507057354.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5353" style="width:371px;height:auto" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/aa04cc46-c785-4ba7-8b57-c18507057354.jpg 832w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/aa04cc46-c785-4ba7-8b57-c18507057354-300x173.jpg 300w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/aa04cc46-c785-4ba7-8b57-c18507057354-768x443.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 832px) 100vw, 832px" /></figure>
</div>


<p>The applicant specified the mark as “The color(s) white, red, and blue is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a design feature comprising five contiguous bands, the first, third, and fifth being white, the second band red, and the fourth band blue. The first and fifth bands are of a smaller width than the second, third, and fourth bands. The dashed lines adjacent the first and fifth bands, and the dashed line depiction of an eyeglass frame, are included merely for perspective and are not part of the mark.”</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-text-color has-black-color has-alpha-channel-opacity has-black-background-color has-background is-style-dots"/>



<p>The JPO examiner rejected the marks on two grounds.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>A lack of inherent distinctiveness; and</li>



<li>Non-conformity to the requisites of a color mark. In this respect, the examiner considered above marks do not solely consist of colors, but contain a figurative element.</li>
</ul>



<p>Apparently, the JPO considers that if an applicant does not indicate a specific position of the color mark, the constituent color(s) should be outlined in a straight line only and not surrounded on all four sides by other colors. In this respect, the following were rejected as a color mark due to nonconformity with the requirements.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="413" src="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-figurative-element-1024x413.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5354" style="aspect-ratio:2.4794760630938106;width:741px;height:auto" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-figurative-element-1024x413.jpg 1024w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-figurative-element-300x121.jpg 300w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-figurative-element-768x310.jpg 768w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-figurative-element-1320x532.jpg 1320w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-figurative-element.jpg 1377w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
</div>


<p>Where an applicant requests registration of a color mark on a specific position in connection with designated goods, constituent color(s) should be outlined in a straight line only or painted on the relevant component entirely, and not be surrounded on all four sides by other colors. Following color marks with a specific position were rejected on this ground.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="721" src="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-specific-position-1024x721.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5355" style="aspect-ratio:1.420268413822255;width:643px;height:auto" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-specific-position-1024x721.jpg 1024w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-specific-position-300x211.jpg 300w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-specific-position-768x540.jpg 768w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-specific-position-1320x929.jpg 1320w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/color-with-specific-position.jpg 1377w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
</div>


<hr class="wp-block-separator has-text-color has-black-color has-alpha-channel-opacity has-black-background-color has-background is-style-dots"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>TM App no. 2025-12124</strong></h3>



<p>On February 6, 2025, Thom Brown, Inc. filed a trademark application for the same color (see below) directly with the JPO for use on eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, sunglasses, eyeglass cases, eyeglass holders, eyeglass chains, and eyeglass cords in Class 9.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="464" height="496" src="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/884f8b94-9b2e-49cd-84a0-5b7a9099f59e.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5356" style="width:296px;height:auto" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/884f8b94-9b2e-49cd-84a0-5b7a9099f59e.jpg 464w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/884f8b94-9b2e-49cd-84a0-5b7a9099f59e-281x300.jpg 281w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 464px) 100vw, 464px" /></figure>
</div>


<p>On August 26, 2025, the JPO examiner issued a notice of refusal grounds only for a lack of inherent distinctiveness laid down in <strong>Article 3(1)(iii) of the Japan Trademark Law</strong>.</p>



<p>As the applicant did not respond to the office action, the JPO decided to reject the entire application on February 24, 2026. The decision is appealable by May 24, 2026.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-text-color has-black-color has-alpha-channel-opacity has-black-background-color has-background is-style-dots"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">TM App no. 2025-128977 (examination pending)</h3>



<p>Seemingly, in anticipation of the refusal, Thom Brown, Inc. filed a trademark application for the color as a position mark with the JPO in the name of a local subsidiary, Thom Brown Japan Co., Ltd., for use on the same goods, on November 10, 2025 [TM App no. 2025-128977].</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="489" height="425" src="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2025-128977.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5357" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2025-128977.jpg 489w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/2025-128977-300x261.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 489px) 100vw, 489px" /></figure>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
