<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>REIWA &#8211; MARKS IP LAW FIRM</title>
	<atom:link href="https://marks-iplaw.jp/tag/reiwa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://marks-iplaw.jp</link>
	<description>Japanese IP Attorney Firm specializing in Trademarks with a commitment to excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 09:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>ja</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Trademark trolls target New Japan era name “REIWA”</title>
		<link>https://marks-iplaw.jp/reiwa/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Masaki MIKAMI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 10:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2019]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inherent distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Examination Guideline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Era name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark troll]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marks-iplaw.jp/?p=1838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Over 1,200 applications filed for Reiwa-related trademarks in China within a month after announcement of the n <a class="more-link" href="https://marks-iplaw.jp/reiwa/">Read More ...</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 1,200 applications filed for Reiwa-related trademarks in China within a month after announcement of the new Imperial era name “REIWA” by the Japanese government on April 1, 2019.</p>
<p>According to a search site of China&#8217;s trademark office, prior to the April 1 announcement of the era name, there was only one trademark application for the name, filed in 2017. However, 238 applications related to REIWA were filed on April 1 alone, when the new era name was announced. The number of such applications further swelled to 1,276 as of April 30.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1842 size-full" src="http://www.marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/China-Reiwa.jpg" alt="" width="684" height="560" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/China-Reiwa.jpg 684w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/China-Reiwa-300x246.jpg 300w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/China-Reiwa-600x491.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 684px) 100vw, 684px" /></p>
<p>The applicants seem to be trying to take advantage of the new era name. Those requests are for registration of names such as &#8220;Reiwado,&#8221; &#8220;Reiwaya&#8221; and &#8220;Reiwa tenka.&#8221; The applications were in a variety of fields ranging from cosmetics to food, with examples including “Reiwa beef” and “Reiwa hall.”</p>
<p>It is unclear whether their applications will be approved. Chinese authorities are unlikely to grant any new permission for trademark names related to REIWA.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3><strong>Other neighbor nations (Taiwan, Korea)</strong></h3>
<p>According to a search site of Taiwan’s IP office, 8 applications related to REIWA were filed after announcement as of May 1.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1839 size-full" src="http://www.marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Taiwan-Reiwa.jpg" alt="" width="756" height="599" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Taiwan-Reiwa.jpg 756w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Taiwan-Reiwa-300x238.jpg 300w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Taiwan-Reiwa-600x475.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 756px) 100vw, 756px" /></p>
<p>In Korea, a search site revealed only 3 applications related to REIWA were filed in April.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1840 size-full" src="http://www.marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Korea-Reiwa.jpg" alt="" width="682" height="532" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Korea-Reiwa.jpg 682w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Korea-Reiwa-300x234.jpg 300w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Korea-Reiwa-600x468.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 682px) 100vw, 682px" /></p>
<h3><strong>Japan</strong></h3>
<p>48 applications related to REIWA were filed to the Japan Patent Office in three days after announcement of the new era name.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-1841 size-full" src="http://www.marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Japan-Reiwa.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="506" srcset="https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Japan-Reiwa.jpg 550w, https://marks-iplaw.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Japan-Reiwa-300x276.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /></p>
<p>As mentioned in <a href="http://blog.marks-iplaw.jp/2019/02/10/era-names/">the previous blog article</a>, the revised trademark guidelines to ensure trademarks do not feature any era name now clearly state that all era names, in principle, cannot be used for trademarks.<br />
It is expected most of the applications are rejected for registration under the latest guidelines.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
